Find on this page
information on new developments in environmental policy and law,
at global, regional and national levels,
interesting reports and documents
published by governments, international institutions or civil society organisations,
links to full texts.
Key messages of documents or reports are highlighted, sometimes with short notes or comments.
Just scroll down and find news and links on:
COVID-19 and the environment
The COVID-19 pandemic is a crisis that needs to be looked at from the environmental point of view, too. Even with the little we know so far (April 2020) the links between the pandemic and environmental factors cannot be denied. We hear and read every day that the mortality from the virus in most cases is due to the combination of the virus infection and the patients’ existing sicknesses many of which may have been caused by environmental pollution or exposure to hazardous substances such as respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases or cancer. Then, there is the discussion about the possible origin of the corona virus infection as a zoonotic disease going back to a human contact with wildlife, and that zoonotic diseases are an increasing risk today because of (illegal) wildlife trade and landuse changes such as deforestation, habitat fragmentation or expanding agricultural practices. The real costs of the measures against the pandemic - the basically global lockdown of many economic activities – will be seen later; they will not only include stress and sufferings for humans and economic disasters but also burdens on the environment and ecosystems.
Therefore, there will be many lessons to be learnt from this crisis, also from an environmental point of view: The economic recovery after the pandemic needs to be environmentally friendly and sustainable; we must reduce pollution which is a major threat to human health, and we must put an end to the pressure on nature and natural resources. The sustainable recovery of the global economy after COVID-19 is not only an opportunity as many argue; it is a necessity to avoid the catastrophes. One may take it as a final warning to eventually take environmental protection seriously.
It will not be easy; have no illusion about it. There is also the risk that the crisis and the enormous amounts of money which governments in a number of countries make available may be (mis-)used by powerful vested interests to go back to business-as-usual or even worse fossil economic practices. So, part of the future work will be to prevent perverse practices, and many in civil society around the world, NGOs but also forward-looking businesses, are aware of the risk and try to watch it carefully. Let us all do that.
For all who see things this way, follow information and statements form international environmental organisations such as:
For a harder look at how financial aid from governments in the Covid-19 pandemic is distributed and used, whether or not the aid is given and used for sustainable development, and how transparent the whole process is, here are links to watchdogs keeping a critical eye on that:
For Germany: www.lobbycontrol.de
For the EU: https://corporateeurope.org/en
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH – Diseases from environmental risks
7 September is the International Day of Clean Air for Blue Skies, marked for the first time in 2020.
From the UNEP press release:
There are good reasons to ask: Where is the media outcry about the 7 million people dying every year from air pollution? A mega city of 7 million people just disappearing, every year, by air pollution alone? Do we simply accept it?
WHO calls for more research into microplastics and a crackdown on plastic pollution
22 August 2019
Note: Media around the world referred to this study as indicating that there was no evidence that microplastics were damaging human health. In reality the WHO declared that we are confronted with a major problem and that it is urgent to do intensive research to clarify the risks. That message is significantly different.
Risks and mortality from air pollution
Air quality in Europe — 2019 report.
This EEA Report presents an updated overview and analysis of air quality in Europe from 2000 to 2017. - Air pollution continues to have significant impacts on the health of the European population, particularly in urban areas. Europe's most serious pollutants, in terms of harm to human health, are PM, NO2 and ground-level O3. - Air pollution also damages vegetation and ecosystems. It leads to several important environmental impacts, which affect vegetation and fauna directly, as well as the quality of water and soil and the ecosystem services they support. The most harmful air pollutants in terms of damage to ecosystems are O3, ammonia and nitrogen oxides (NOX).
In a new study „Cardiovascular disease burden from ambient air pollution in Europe reassessed using novel hazard ratio functions”, published in the current issue of the European Heart Journal (Feb 2019), a team of scientists updates the calculations of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD), a worldwide health study, and also its own calculations in the past: The previous calculation of the global mortality rate of 4.5 million deaths per year from air pollution is now re-assessed to amount to 8.8 million deaths per year. Europe has a higher rate of mortality than the global average; around 800.000 people die in Europe from air pollution every year, the study finds.
Study download: https://academic.oup.com/DocumentLibrary/EHJ/2019_PR/ehz135.pdf
WHO Report (March 2016) “Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks”. See: http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/publications/preventing-disease/en/
Economic cost of the health impact of air pollution in Europe - WHO Europe, study published 29 April 2016. --- A staggering US $ 1.6 trillion is the economic cost of the approximate 600 000 premature deaths and of the diseases caused by air pollution in the WHO European Region in 2010, according to the first-ever study of these costs conducted for the Region. The amount is nearly equivalent to one tenth of the gross domestic product (GDP) of the entire European Union in 2013. - - -The economic value of deaths and diseases due to air pollution – US$ 1 600 000 000 000 – corresponds to the amount societies are willing to pay to avoid these deaths and diseases with necessary interventions. In these calculations, a value is attached to each death and disease, independent of the age of the person and which varies according to the national economic context. --- Air pollution: the single largest environmental health risk --- Over 90% of citizens in the Region are exposed to annual levels of outdoor fine particulate matter that are above WHO's air quality guidelines. This accounted for 482 000 premature deaths in 2012 from heart and respiratory diseases, blood vessel conditions and strokes, and lung cancer. In the same year, indoor air pollution resulted in an additional 117 200 premature deaths, five times more in low- and middle-income countries than in high-income countries.
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE
New GDP Center/UNCTAD Report: A New Multilateralism for Shared Prosperity
This report, launched on 12 April 2019, advances a set of “Geneva Principles for a Global Green New Deal” that can form the foundations for a new multilateral trade and investment regime that has shared prosperity and sustainable development as its core goals. The report has been prepared by the Boston University Global Development Policy (GDP) Center and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
The report states, inter alia:
The report concludes: The “Geneva Principles for a Global Green New Deal” advances an urgent research and policy agenda for a New Multilateralism that rebuilds the rules of the global economy toward goals of coordinated stability, shared prosperity, and environmental sustainability, while deliberately respecting the space for national policy sovereignty.
State of the environment - recent reports:
Published in time for the Fourth United Nations Environmental Assembly, UN Environment’s sixth Global Environment Outlook (2019) calls on decision makers to take immediate action to address pressing environmental issues to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals as well as other Internationally Agreed Environment Goals, such as the Paris Agreement.
It emphasizes that urgent and inclusive action is needed by decision makers at all levels to achieve a healthy planet with healthy people.
Global Chemicals Outlook, second edition, 2019 - The Global Chemicals Outlook II – From Legacies to Innovative Solutions: Implementing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, mandated by the UN Environment Assembly in 2016, seeks to alert policymakers and other stakeholders to the critical role of the sound management of chemicals and waste in sustainable development. It takes stock of global trends as well as progress made and gaps in achieving the global goal to minimize the adverse impacts from chemicals and waste by 2020. The Global Chemicals Outlook II finds that the global goal to minimize adverse impacts of chemicals and waste will not be achieved by 2020. Solutions exist, but more ambitious worldwide action by all stakeholders is urgently required.
The Living Planet Report 2018 is the 12th edition of WWF’s biennial flagship publication.
Global Resources Outlook 2019
Natural Resources for the Future We Want
Since the 1970s, global population has doubled and global Gross Domestic Product has grown fourfold. These trends have required large amounts of natural resources to fuel economic development and the attendant improvements in human well-being this has brought across the globe. However, these gains have come at a tremendous cost to our natural environment, ultimately impacting human well-being and exacerbating inequalities within and between countries.
The Global Risks Report 2019
The World Economic Forum (WEF) has published the 14th edition of its annual report ranking global risks, both in terms of impact and likelihood, with environmental threats topping both lists for the third year in a row.
World Water Development Report 2019 - Leaving No One Behind
The 2019 edition of the World Water Development Report (WWDR 2019) entitled ‘Leaving No One Behind’ seeks to inform policy and decision-makers, inside and outside the water community, how improvements in water resources management and access to water supply and sanitation services are essential to overcoming poverty and addressing various other social and economic inequities. It was launched at the Human Rights Council, at the Palais des Nations in Geneva (Switzerland), on 19 March 2019.
From the Report:
2,1 billion people have no access to clean and permanently available drinking water. Menschen haben keinen Zugang zu sauberem und durchgängig verfügbarem Trinkwasser. 4,3 billion people cannot use clean sanitary places.
Governance developments: UNEP & UNEA
On UNEP activities see: https://www.unenvironment.org/
On UNEA (UN Environment Assembly) see: http://web.unep.org/environmentassembly/
On the 2019 session of UNEA see a summary at: http://enb.iisd.org/unep/oecpr4-unea4/
A book to remember a milestone in the debate not only about sustainable development but also the need of international environmental governance reform: Defining Sustainable Development for Our Common Future. A History of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission). By Iris Borowy, Routledge, November 2013.
The UN World Commission on Environment and Development, chaired by former Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland, alerted the world to the urgency of making progress toward economic development that could be sustained without depleting natural resources or harming the environment. The Brundtland Report strongly argued that sustainable development must be based on social, economic and environmental grounds, and that this change in perception must also have institutional implications at national and international levels. Some 30 years after the Brundtland Commission started its work we are still struggling with it.
More …. http://www.routledge.com
Rio+20 (2012) --- The Future We Want - The final document adopted at Rio+20 Conference, available at: http://www.uncsd2012.org/thefuturewewant.html
The Contested Legacy of Rio+20, by Maria Ivanova, (September 20th, 2012). See: http://uncsd.iisd.org/guest-articles/the-contested-legacy-of-rio20/
EUROPEAN UNION ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
The current environmental programme (2013-2020)
"Living well, within the limits of our planet" --- New EU environmental action program formally adopted.
On 15 November 2013 the Council adopted a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a general union environment action programme to 2020 (PE-CO_S 64/13, 15519/13 ADD1 REV1). Adoption of the legislation followed an agreement reached during the informal discussions with the European Parliament on 19 June 2013. The seventh Environment Action Programme entitled "Living well, within the limits of our planet" replaces the sixth programme, which expired in July 2012.
More at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/envir/139603.pdf
EEA publication “The European environment – state and outlook 2020”, its new State of the Environment Report (SOER) released on 4 December 2019:. --- With important messages such as:
A sobering reading indeed, for all of us, decision-makers and citizens. More at: www.eea.europa.eu
New European Commission
The new EC is approved by the EP on 27 November 2019. It is noted here as environment and climate change are said to be priorities of the new EC. The new EC President, Ms. von der Leyen, announced a proposal for a Green New Deal to be submitted very soon. The environmental community will probably watch it very attentively, to see if it comes and how green and new the deal is when it comes. The Green New Deal was called for so long. was promised so often, and is still awaited. Will it eventually see the light?
Reforming the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP)
Agriculture is a core sector in the EU. The CAP is a core EU policy. Agriculture is at the core of the environmental problems in Europe.
This is not new, and pressure to reform the CAP has a long history in the meantime. It seems though that obstacles are rather high to change the CAP which promotes – or at least does not prevent - practices threatening and damaging nature and biodiversity and undermining the basis of life and even the very basis of agriculture itself. Not to speak of the economic and social impacts it has in Europe and elsewhere.
November 2019: A number of organisations on behalf of more than 2500 scientists make another attempt and send an open letter “Reform the CAP: harmful agriculture is destroying nature” to the European Parliament and the members of the new European Commission.
A quote from the letter: “The CAP is turning rural areas into green deserts of uninhabitable maximum-yield monocultures. The greening measures within Pillar 1 of the CAP are largely ineffective at retaining or restoring biodiversity and are too often poorly controlled. The current agri-environmental schemes are both underfunded and insufficiently targeted to meet the scale of the damage to farmland biodiversity. In-depth analyses also show that the proposal made by the Commission for the CAP post-2020 fails to offer a real reform, and even risks lower ambition. Without a fundamental reform of the CAP, such negative trends will not only diminish nature in current EU member states, but will also threaten the nature of candidates ones. EU membership should not be causing silent springs.“
Text of the open letter: https://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/open-letter-reform-cap
Complying with EU environmental legislation
See the monthly infringement procedures at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/legal/law/press_en.htm
EU enlargement and the environment
For the annual enlargement packages, see: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/countries/strategy-and-progress-report/index_en.ht
Free trade and the environment
Criticism of the EU's free trade agreement practices is widespread, it comes from many sides and raises many issues, environmental and others. The debate focused for some time on the (planned)
TTIP with the US and the CETA with Canada, the latter having been signed and now being in the ratification processes. Meanwhile, the criticim addresses the EU's free trade agreements generally. The
tensions between the two principles - free trade and environmental protection - are obvious. An early warning came from a German government advisory body: "Making TTIP
environmentally sound", German Advisory Council on the Environment, opinion released 24 February 2016, more at: http://www.umweltrat.de/EN/TheGermanAdvisoryCouncilOnTheEnvironment/thegermanadvisorycouncilontheenvironment_node.html
The Impact of Environmental Law - Stories of the World We Want, published in the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law series, edited by Rose-Liza Eisma-Osorio, University of Cebu, Philippines, Elizabeth A. Kirk, University of Lincoln, UK and Jessica Steinberg Albin, Elisabeth Haub School of Law, Pace University, US. 2020, 192 pp. - This book invites readers to rethink environmental law and its critical role in ensuring a sustainable future for all. Illustrating narratives of successful developments in environmental law, contributors draw out key lessons and practices for effective reform and highlight opportunities by which we can respond to environmental challenges facing the planet. - More at:
Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group established by the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 72/277 (“Towards a Global Pact for the Environment”), second session 18-20 March 2019, summary at http://enb.iisd.org/unep/globalpact/oewg2/
“Global Pact” more at https://globalpact.informea.org/
Gaps in international environmental law and environment-related instruments: towards a global pact for the environment. Report of the UN Secretary-General, 30 November 2018, UN Doc A/73/419. Link at http://enb.iisd.org/unep/globalpact/oewg2/
Global Assessment of the Environmental Rule of Law: Launched on 24 January 2019, the first ever global assessment of environmental rule of law finds weak enforcement to be a global trend that is exacerbating environmental threats, despite prolific growth in environmental laws and agencies worldwide over the last four decades.
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT & SDG
Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals:
All information on SDGs and the developments since 2015, also on the High-Level Political Forum regular meetings: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
UN 2019 Sustainable Development Report. Released 12 Sep 2019.
The Sustainable Development Report 2019, a Bertelsmann Foundation publication, was released on 19 June 2019. Among the main findings are:
Eradicating poverty and strengthening equity remain important policy priorities. Eradicating extreme poverty remains a global challenge with half of the world’s nations not on track for achieving SDG 1 (No Poverty).
Critical voices: idea and reality of sustainable development
Sustainability will only be achieved if we change, at a global scale, the way we produce and consume, how we run the economy, and this change must be fundamental. Many if not all agree with this statement; yet, what happens in practice? Are we on the way to sustainable development or are we not? --- Clearly, change is a matter of awareness, knowledge and strategic thinking but it is also a matter of interests and power. No doubt, there are powerful interestes blocking the road to sustainability. They need to be known, analysed and overcome. For that, we need critical voices and reality checks: Where are the interests, where is the power, and how can change be organized? --- There's no need to share all the critical views but we should not ignore them and should think about.
A drastical look at realities of the globalized economy gives the Mighty Earth Report “Cargill, the worst company in the world”, released on 9 July 2019. - A fairly critical look at unsustainable practices of a big company in various parts of the world.
For German-speaking readers:
Thilo Bode, Die Diktatur der Konzerne. Wie globale Unternehmen uns schaden und die Demokratie zerstören. S. Fischer, 2018. - The former Greenpeace International CEO and then founder of Foodwatch presents multiple examples of where economic power sits today.
Jean Feyder, Leistet Widerstand. Eine andere Welt ist möglich, Westend, 2018. - The long-time respresentative of Luxembourg at the UN in Geneva, gives insights into national and international economic and trade policies. His hopes are with civil society pushing for change. Civil society and collective actions against destructive practices, need to be mobilized and organized, though. How to achieve that? Don't we need, again, society mechanisms like policies and media diagnozed often to be "on the other side"?
Another critical view, already a view years back but more valid than ever, suggesting that we are far from abandoning the unsustainable way of production and consumption: Kathrin
Hartmann, Aus kontrolliertem Raubbau, 2015, Blessing-Verlag. - A sobering look at unsustainable use of natural resources, pollution of the environment, suffering of people, and attempts to
camouflage all that.
WMO Statement on the state of the global climate 2019, published 2020
The WMO on 25 Nov 2019 published findings on another record high in GHG concentration in 2018: Globally averaged concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) reached 407.8 parts per million in 2018, up from 405.5 parts per million (ppm) in 2017. - WMO Press Release https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/greenhouse-gas-concentrations-atmosphere-reach-yet-another-high
UNEP's 2019 Emission Gap Report was released on 26 November 2019.
From the messages:
UNEP itself introducing the report on its site: "1.5°C goal at brink of impossible."
Text of Report at: https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2019
UNEP 2019: Lessons from a decade of emissions gap assessments.
From the introduction: “…this publication revisits the gap rationale and how it has evolved, comparing the expectations following the Copenhagen Accord with the reality 10 years later. The findings are sobering. Despite a decade of increasing political and societal focus on climate change and the milestone Paris Agreement, global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have not been curbed, and the emissions gap is larger than ever.” Read more at:
FCCC / UNDP Report: THE HEAT IS ON, Taking Stock of the Global Climate Ambition, NDC Global Outlook Report 2019, released Sep 2019. – From the messages: It’s clear that business as usual simply isn’t good enough anymore. We must do more – much more – in areas related to mitigation, adaptation, and the finance to support all of this work. And we must do it quickly.
More at: https://outlook.ndcs.undp.org/
IPCC Special Report on the Oceans and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC),
released on 25 September 2019.
Summary for Policy-Makers https://report.ipcc.ch/srocc/pdf/SROCC_SPM_Approved.pdf
IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Land (SRCCL), released on 8 August 2019 and addressing land as a critical resource, desertification and land degradation, food security, and land and climate change responses.
Download at: https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl-report-download-page/
WMO Statement on the State of the Global Climate in 2018. This publication, issued on 28 March 2019, marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of the WMO Statement on the State of the Global Climate, which was first issued in 1994.
2018 was the fourth warmest year on record. – 2015-2018 were the four warmest years on record as the long-term warming trend continues. - Ocean heat content is at a record high and global mean sea level continues to rise. - Artic and Antarctic sea-ice extent is well below average. - Extreme weather had an impact on lives and sustainable development on every continent. - Average global temperature reached approximately 1 °C above pre-industrial levels . - We are not on track to meet climate change targets and rein in temperature increases . - Every fraction of a degree of warming makes a difference.
IPCC SPECIAL REPORT: Global Warming of 1.5 ºC.
Issued 2018, revised January 2019: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
Human activities are estimated to have caused approximately 1.0°C of global warming above
pre-industrial levels, with a likely range of 0.8°C to 1.2°C. Global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C
between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate. (high confidence)
Warming from anthropogenic emissions from the pre-industrial period to the present will persist for
centuries to millennia and will continue to cause further long-term changes in the climate system,
such as sea level rise, with associated impacts (high confidence), but these emissions alone are
unlikely to cause global warming of 1.5°C (medium confidence).
Climate-related risks for natural and human systems are higher for global warming of 1.5°C than
at present, but lower than at 2°C (high confidence). These risks depend on the magnitude and rate
of warming, geographic location, levels of development and vulnerability, and on the choices and
implementation of adaptation and mitigation options (high confidence).
Climate-related risks to health, livelihoods, food security, water supply, human security, and
economic growth are projected to increase with global warming of 1.5°C and increase further with
Pathways limiting global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot would require rapid
and far-reaching transitions in energy, land, urban and infrastructure (including transport and
buildings), and industrial systems (high confidence). These systems transitions are unprecedented
in terms of scale, but not necessarily in terms of speed, and imply deep emissions reductions in all
sectors, a wide portfolio of mitigation options and a significant up-scaling of investments in those
options (medium confidence).
More ... https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
Paris Agreement 2015
Text of Paris Agreement: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
More information on the process:
All info on the Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC), its COPs, Meetings of the Parties under Kyoto and Paris, decisions, documents etc: https://unfccc.int/
The ice shields of the Earth are melting rapidly
A new study published in Cryosphere concludes: We combine satellite observations and numerical models to show that Earth lost 28 trillion t of ice between 1994 and 2017. Arctic sea ice (7.6 trillion t), Antarctic ice shelves (6.5 trillion t), mountain glaciers (6.2 trillion t), the Greenland ice sheet (3.8 trillion t), the Antarctic ice sheet (2.5 trillion t), and Southern Ocean sea ice (0.9 trillion t) have all decreased in mass. Just over half (60 %) of the ice loss was from the northern hemisphere, and the remainder (40 %) was from the southern hemisphere. The rate of ice loss has risen by 57 % since the 1990s – from 0.8 to 1.2 trillion t per year – owing to increased losses from mountain glaciers, Antarctica, Greenland, and from Antarctic ice shelves. During the same period, the loss of grounded ice from the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets and mountain glaciers raised the global sea level by 35.0 ± 3.2 mm. The majority of all ice losses from were driven by atmospheric melting (68 % from Arctic sea ice, mountain glaciers ice shelf calving and ice sheet surface mass balance), with the remaining losses (32 % from ice sheet discharge and ice shelf thinning) being driven by oceanic melting. Altogether, the cryosphere has taken up 3.2 % of the global energy imbalance.
Source: Slater, T., Lawrence, I. R., Otosaka, I. N., Shepherd, A., Gourmelen, N., Jakob, L., Tepes, P., and Gilbert, L.: Review Article: Earth's ice imbalance, The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2020-232, in review, 2020.
Losing Earth, by Nathaniel Rich, Pan Macmillan, 2019;
in German published by Rowohlt Verlag, 2019
The Uninhabitable Earth - Life After Warming, By David Wallace-Wells, 2019
Publication on the Paris Agreement (in German):
“Unter 2 Grad? Was der Weltklimavertrag wirklich bringt“ ("Below 2°? What the world climate agreement is really good for"). --- Details: Sommer, Jörg & Müller, Michael (Hrsg.), Unter 2 Grad? Was der Weltklimavertrag wirklich bringt. 320 S., Stuttgart (Hirzel-Verlag, 2016), ISBN 978-3-7776-2570-6, Euro 19,80
Contributions by: Franz Alt, Hans Diefenbacher, Ottmar Edenhofer, Christian Flachsland, Jochen Flasbarth, Thomas Friesel, Hartmut Graßl, Rüdiger Haum, Peter Hennicke, Lukas Hermwille, Anton Hofreiter, Pierre Ibisch, Hartmut Ihne, Andreas Jung, Claudia Kemfert, Ulrike Kornek, Maria Krautzberger, Manfred Kriener, Martin Kaiser, Mojib Latif, Reinhold Leinfelder, Claude Martin, Matthias Miersch, Volker Mosbrugger, Michael Müller, Kai Niebert, Hermann E. Ott, Nick Reimer, Holger Rogall, Sabine Schlacke, Ann-Kathrin Schneider, Uwe Schneidewind, Susanne Schwarz, Christoph Seidler, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Jörg Sommer, Frank Uekötter, Barbara Unmüßig, Beate Weber-Schuerholz, Hubert Weiger, Anders Wijkman, Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker. --- The book was published on 22 April 2016, the day when the Paris Agreement was signed. ---
The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) 2019 Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. - First global biodiversity assessment since 2005. - A definitive new global synthesis of the state of nature, ecosystems and nature's contributions to people - the first such report since the landmark Millennium Ecosystem Assessment published in 2005, and the first ever that is inter-governmental - will be presented to representatives of 132 Governments for consideration of approval in May 2019. - Report agreed on and Summary for Policy-Makers released on 6 May 2019. Some fundamental findings:
For other assessment reports of IPBES, especially the regional reports on Africa, Asia, Europe and the Americas, released in 2018, see https://www.ipbes.net/assessment-reports
IUCN protected area guidelines
Borrini-Feyerabend, G., N. Dudley, T. Jaeger, B. Lassen, N. Pathak Broome, A. Phillips and T. Sandwith (2013), Governance of Protected Areas: From understanding to action. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 20, Gland, Switzerland, IUCN. xvi + 124pp. ---
The guidelines are available online at: www.iucn.org/publications
State of world forests - reports and data
Loss of animal species in forests by 50% since 1970 at global level. - WWF Forest Report 2019, released 13 August 2019. -
The tropics lost 12 million hectares of tree cover in 2018, the fourth-highest annual loss since record-keeping began in 2001. Of greatest concern is the disappearance of 3.6 million hectares of primary rainforest, an area the size of Belgium. The figures come from updated data from the University of Maryland, released 25 April 2019 on Global Forest Watch.
Open letter of scientists on Brazil
In an open letter to the EU, published on 26 April 2019 in “Science”, more than 600 scientists and two organisations representing 300 indigenous peoples, raise human rights and environment protection concerns over Brazil’s current policies and request the EU bodies to insist in the trade negotiations with Brazil in the respect of human rights and environmental standards : “We urge the EU to make trade negotiations with Brazil conditional on: (i) upholding the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; (ii) improving procedures to trace commodities associated with deforestation and Indigenous rights conflicts; and (iii) consulting with, and gaining consent from, Indigenous Peoples and local communities to define strict social and environmental criteria for traded commodities.”
Open letter at: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/364/6438/341.1
MARINE ENVIRONMENT AND POLAR REGIONS
Intergovernmental Conference on an International Legally Binding Instrument under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction, Second Session 25 March-5 April 2019. - Summary of the session with brief history and background at: http://enb.iisd.org/oceans/bbnj/igc2/
German Advisory Council on Global Change Flagship Report 2013:
World in Transition: Governing the Marine Heritage
Despite numerous international treaties and voluntary commitments, the seas are still being massively overfished, polluted and increasingly exploited as the Earth's last resort. In view of the oceans’ poor condition the WBGU developed a long-term vision of the conservation and sustainable use of the blue continent: All marine zones with the exception of territorial waters should be declared the common heritage of mankind. In order to move closer to this ultimate goal for ocean governance, the WBGU also makes recommendations for action that link up with ongoing political processes. In this context it examines the example of two focal themes: food (sustainable fisheries and aquaculture) and energy from the sea. The report shows that sustainable stewardship of the oceans is urgently necessary, that the seas can be incorporated into a transformation towards a low-carbon, sustainable society, and that such a transformation can achieve substantial benefits worldwide both for a sustainable energy supply and for food security.
The report is in German, with an English summary. The flagship reports of the Council are all available online. ---
The English version has been published in February 2014 ---
More ... http://www.wbgu.de/fr-2013-oceans
Arctic: Life Linked to Ice. This new report on biodiversity impacts of sea ice changes (Oct 2013) examines the consequences for biodiversity of the dramatic changes occurring to sea ice. It was prepared by the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna working group (CAFF), and both draws from and builds on Arctic Council assessments in order to present an overview of the state of knowledge about sea-ice-associated biodiversity. The report is intended as a briefing and reference document for policy makers. ---
Fishery practices in the Arctic: new report on destructive fisheries (March 2016).
ENVIRONMENT AND WASTE
Biodegradable bags can hold a full load of shopping three years after being discarded in the environment. Researchers from the International Marine Litter Research Unit (University of Plymouth) publish new research in Environmental Science and Technology. More about this study published 29 April 2019 at: https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/news/biodegradable-bags-can-hold-a-full-load-of-shopping-three-years-after-being-discarded-in-the-environment
So, we better forget about plastic bags altogether, “bio” or not, support all initiatives that could phase them out, and go shopping with the good old shopping bags. That’s really no big deal.
Global trade in plastic waste
A new GAIA (Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives) report, published on 23 April 2019, analyses the current trends in global trade in plastic wastes, the origin of the wastes in industrialized countries (21 countries of origin with USA, UK, Germany and Japan on top), and the environmental impacts in the receiving countries (water contamination, crop death, illness, and the open burning of plastic waste) whose communities lack the capacities to deal adequately with the wastes. Just another issue of justice in international environmental governance. With data from Greenpeace Southeast Asia.
The report at GAIA’s webpage:
The issue is at the Basel Convention meeting 29 April – 10 May 2019 which discusses a proposal of Norway to apply the prior-informed-consent rule to the export of plastic wastes. More on the meeting, the Basel Convention, and its role in international waste governance at http://www.basel.int/
The legacy of Chernobyl and Fukushima. - A new report addresses the unsettled problems of nuclear energy uses:
At the occasion of remembering Chernobyl (1986) and Fukushima (2011) the Federal Minister for the environment declared (10 March 2016): "Nuclear energy has no future". See: www.bmub.bund.de/presse.
At the same time (March 2016), the German Federal Constitutional Court considers the case brought before it by power supply companies that the phasing out of nuclear energy in Germany decided in 2011 by the federal government was unconstitutional.
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
For a comprehensive all-inclusive and regular preview of upcoming events in the environment and sustainable development fields, including major international conferences and meetings, see: http://www.iisd.org/calendar/